Technique and symbols, street art tour done properly

Our guide for the epic street art tour

I have been meaning to write about this incredible street art tour I went on in Lisbon. The tour we were on was 3 hours long and many didn’t survive the full tour but me and my partner did and were so much wiser for doing so.

There was so much to say but here are some of the key parts.

The viewing angle can make all the difference

Street art from an angle

Our guide showed us different examples where something was transformed into a whole new experience when stood in the right place. The one above is well loved and exists in many photos. However our guide talked about the importance of angle and viewpoint. When we moved to the carefully marked ground point, you could see the outline of the building in front obfuscating the other half of the street art.

Unique technique

Brush strokes as unique technique

Uniqueness is obviously key in street art and our conversation with the tour guide was fascinating as he asked if I preferred technique or message. Coming from Bristol, it was about the message but he pointed out one of my likely favourite artists now (Utopia).

Utopia's fingerprint style upclose

Those things which look like brush strokes are not, they are unique ways to spray and it requires a lot of time and practice. So much so, its like a fingerprint.

Subtle statements about politics and religion

When you see the devil face you can not un-see it in street art?

Although our guide valued technique over statement. He did show us another piece I had seen previously. The first time I had seen it, it was all about the amazing tile design in Portugal but our guide, pointed out something which looks like eyes, then the mouth. Almost like a devil faces (once you see them you can’t un-see them!). I was thinking where is he going with this, then he pointed out the small church it faced and stoked up the long running issues with Catholicism in Portugal. He left with the point to me, you don’t need to make statements so explicit for them to have an effect.

Highlighting the missed

The panda likes...

Once last thing which I didn’t really see previously was other street artists highlighting other work. For example the panda can be seen across Portugal in different styles but its not about the panda. The panda likes something and is drawing attention to something important or great.

The panda likes the gay fishes

The panda likes the gay fishes which symbolises one of Lisbon’s first gay clubs and has been there for decades but is easily missed.

After this street art tour, I’m going to be a lot more choosy about which ones I pay for in the future!

See no evil bristol project

My parents (of all people) filled me in on this graffiti/street art project which took place in Bristol. Had no idea but good on Bristol Council for making this happen. I’m sure they must have seen the success from the Banksy versus Bristol Museum thing last year, and thought lets embrace it. It must be great for tourism and to be frank that street was pretty dire, so this is going to be a great new face lift.

Taking back the internet and our cityspaces

Segregation Wall in Palestine

I bought Banksy's Wall and Piece book today (24 Dec 2005) while doing a last minute christmas shopping run in Bristol today. I've already seen quite a lot of the Banksy's work but its great to have most of it in one book which can be easily leant to people who I know is pretty good. Anyhow I was flicking through the book and I started to check out some of these quotes, specially this one.

Imagine a city where graffiti wasn't illegal, a city where everybody could draw wherever they liked. Where every street was awash with a million colours and little phrases. Where standing at a bus stop was never boring. A city that felt lika a party where everyone was invited, not just the estate agents and barons of big business. Imagine a city like that and stop leaning against the wall – it's wet.

Its interesting because this is exactly the same vision of the internet Tim Berners-Lee and others had from day one. You know every part would be rewritable by anyone. Cant find the quote, but I did find this from the BBC. Damm I forgot to link to How the read/write web was lost. Which talks about how Tim Berners-Lee's vision of a read/write web was slowly edged out of the picture.

Well in some ways. The idea was that anybody who used the web would have a space where they could write and so the first browser was an editor, it was a writer as well as a reader. Every person who used the web had the ability to write something. It was very easy to make a new web page and comment on what somebody else had written, which is very much what blogging is about.

For years I had been trying to address the fact that the web for most people wasn't a creative space; there were other editors, but editing web pages became difficult and complicated for people. What happened with blogs and with wikis, these editable web spaces, was that they became much more simple.

When you write a blog, you don't write complicated hypertext, you just write text, so I'm very, very happy to see that now it's gone in the direction of becoming more of a creative medium.

Just like Banksy's vision the internet slowly moved away from its core slightly utopian vision and started to become like the cityscapes of what Banksy pushes against. Although web 2.0 gets a lot of stick, the main thurst is about people. And thats a positive thing.

>

There's also been a long running meme that a website should not be a set thing which is delivered to the end browser. HTML is intreperated by browsers and always will be. We should expect every browser to do the basics correctly, like the box model in CSS should be apply in the same way to all browsers but for a site to expect there site to be displayed with the style they have set is unreasonable and not a good thing. Anyone should be able to change the style, remove the style and even extract the sections there really after without resulting to haxor techniques. You could say these techniques are the same ones applied by Banksy because things have got so bad in our cityscapes. The internet has luckly not got that bad yet. Actually with the advent of Firefox and its huge selection of public generated extensions the opposite is actually true. Then if you go one step further you have Greasemonkey which then allows you to alter any page in anyway you see fit and save the results to share with others. And now we have Flock which is browser which is made from day one to foster the vision of the read/write internet. Yes it all seems pretty much a bolt on for now, but that will change.

I have not really mentioned it on this blog yet, but Microsoft's SSE (RSS Simple sharing extensions) could close the feedback loop in the RSS space. Even if that fails, I can certainly see a tighter trackback type mechinasm or an annotation mechinasm growing in popularity. Jon Udell talks up the read/write web. I mean even today, the mainstream media are falling over themsleves to have user (hate that word so much) public generated comments and feedback, even if there implimented in odd and unsatficatory ways.

Although this is no biggy for most people reading this, its in the same way as Napster (and of course Bit torrent) have as default the option to share your downloads. Making you a supplier as well as a consumer, is a fundamental shift. The likes which Banksy can only wish for in the cityscapes of the analogue world. We need to keep this at the forefront of the web 2.0 dash and where ever we go from there. Parciptation of people is key.

Interestingly at the same time I bought Wall and Piece I was looking for We the media for my sister. She's got quite old fashioned views about the internet but rather than me trying to convince her, I thought as shes studying Fashion Journalism the book would be a ideal read on two counts. However it never quite happened because I simply could not find Dan Gilmor's we the media anywhere in Bristol on Christmas Eve. But what took me and even Sarah back was the fact that the books on offer in the Computer sections of Blackwells and Waterstones were so boring. I hate to say it but they were so web 1.0. The only saving grace was the new Search and Amazon books which were present at Waterstones. But generally they were about how to create HTML pages using Dreamweaver, how to program using PHP, ASP, etc, etc, etc… Nothing web 2.0 ish in the slightest. Nothing about blogging, wikis, podcasting, public parciptation! Its such a shame because it puts across such a different view of where the internet is today.

Comments [Comments]
Trackbacks [0]