The sound of snow falling in sunshine mix from cubicgarden at Letsmix.com.
The whole thing is a joke I would say, I had pretty much given up to tell the truth. The NGDJ (next generation dj contest) has published a warning that all qualifiers to the contest will be scrutinized.
A quick note regarding the NGDJ Qualifiers: Leading up to the end of NGDJ Stage 1, we will be investigating all Qualifier mixes. Voting patterns related to accounts or mixes which are in breach of the NGDJ Terms and Conditions may lead to any of the following:
- Votes being retracted
- Mixes being denoted from Qualifier status
- The banning of Letsmix.com accountsIn addition to this we would like to inform you that this procedure might also affect mix rating averages and vote totals. All decisions and results following this investigation are final.
Voting issues, why? This is part of the problem,
For the stage 1
The NGDJ eligibility period will begin December 15th 2009 and will end on January 31st 2010, after which Stage 1 (“NGDJ Qualifiers Eligibility Period”) ends. To register and compete in NGDJ, visit http://www.letsmix.com and fully complete all required fields on the online registration form, and proceed to upload your DJ mix. Spread your NGDJ submission widely; you must gain a minimum of 200 ratings to be deemed a qualifier. The top one hundred qualifiers will then be determined by their average mix rating to remain in contest as Stage 2 commences.
Basically if you browse around the current qualifiers for the contest, you will find many examples of mixes which have something like 206 votes but only 60 actual listens. Go figure, obviously something is going on. What bugs me is that the legitimate mixes like mine (80 listens and 62 votes of a average of 4.8 out of 5) are going to lose out simply because I didn’t cheat like everyone else.
This comment sums up my thoughts too…
I don’t know why you didn’t make another voting procedure. My idea:
1. The vote button to be enabled only after the mix was listened at least 30 min
2. The rate of the mix to be shown only after the vote was placed.
3. The competitors shouldn’t be able to vote other mixes. The actual situation is not very good cause some of the “djs” here are not acquainted with the term FAIR PLAY and are not open minded.
4. The owner of the mix should be able to see a review of the votes he received on each day (how much stars has each vote).
So before the end of the month, if you’ve not voted for my mix, please do.
Categories
- aggregator (9)
- culture-and-politics (186)
- design-and-ideas (211)
- home entertainment (10)
- italic+mixing (77)
- just-plain-life (203)
- media-and-expression (284)
- italic+mixing (5)
- play-and-games (29)
- science+theory (26)
- social-hardware (254)
- socialware-offline (17)
- socialware-online (187)
- socialware-offline (225)
- technology (439)
- home entertainment (7)
- mobile-technology (198)
- technology-and-computing (146)
- xml and web 2.0 (317)
- data-and-semantic-web (104)
Recent Posts
- Pipeling our reality
- Teresa Valdez Klein – The Art of Subvertising on Facebook
- Working from the Northern Quarter
- Ignite Leeds: Who pays on the first date?
- We’re either riding or queuing
- 1 concept 2 films…
- Should I apply for a BBC Three dating experiment?
- My next phone… Its that of the year again
- Samsung Galaxy Tab 7++
- Surround Video on the next Xbox?
- Who needs SOPA when you have the DMCA?
- Talking at TEDxManchester
- Leeds Ignite updated to Feb 2nd
- Difference between Nerd, Dork, and Geek
- Distributed Social Networking, one day soon?
- There’s a open life in the Pacemaker yet
- Will I move to Ubuntu TV?
- The late night mixes
- Host of seraphim, gives me the chills every time
- Manchester Werewolf chapter – Wed 25rd Jan
What I'm Doing...
- Just to point out #SMC_MCR Perceptivemedia is a very early bbc rd research project and raises a ton of questions as you noticed... 1 hr ago
- Games engine hopefully RT @Chris_Hackett: "the set top box needs to be an engine" @cubicgarden at #SMC_MCR 1 hr ago
- #smc_mcr with @foodiesarah talking about a project to work with startups... http://t.co/xMisUKuC 5 hrs ago
- #smc_mcr with @MartinSFP @technicalfault http://t.co/Mf4HfNMc 5 hrs ago
- One for #smc_mcr @MartinSFP @technicalfault ... what happened to Shh.sh? 5 hrs ago
- More updates...
Archives
Recent Comments
- Ian Forrester on Ignite Leeds: Who pays on the first date?
- Teresa Valdez Klein – The Art of Subvertising on Facebook | Cubicgarden.com on Feel inspired by, I am, I do…
- Anonymous on Ignite Leeds: Who pays on the first date?
- Ian Forrester on Ignite Leeds: Who pays on the first date?
- ianforrester on We’re either riding or queuing
- Surfturfstiles on Should I apply for a BBC Three dating experiment?
- Anonymous on Ignite Leeds: Who pays on the first date?
- Making changes to the Letter: Help Dyslexics read « Amena Khan's Blog on Dyslexie: A typeface for dyslexics
- Anonymous on We’re either riding or queuing
- Ian Forrester on Distributed Social Networking, one day soon?
Tags
android apple backstage barcamp bbc bbcbackstage bittorrent blog blogging conference dance dating dj drm ebook facebook flickr geek geekdinner google internet iphone kindle linux london londongeekdinner manchester microsoft mix mobile music orange pacemaker phone podcast rss science social trance tv ubuntu uk video werewolf xbmcLifestream
-
Published Pipeling our reality.
-
Published Working from the Northern Quarter.
-
Published Ignite Leeds: Who pays on the first date?.
-
Shared Who pays on the first date?.
-
Published We’re either riding or queuing.
-
Published 1 concept 2 films….
-
Published My next phone… Its that of the year again.
-
Published Samsung Tab 7++.
-
